WordPress is free, and the most expensive way to run a business website
Modelled over three years, the same site costs 4,418 dollars on Framer, 7,016 on Webflow and 12,612 on WordPress. The monthly fee is the smallest number on the page.
Download the PDF guideWordPress is free. It is also the most expensive way to run a business website.
The same site, three platforms, three years
14 pages, a 60-post blog, 25,000 monthly visits, no store, built in-house at 70 dollars an hour. 3-year total cost of ownership:
- Framer: 4,418 dollars.
- Webflow: 7,016 dollars.
- WordPress: 12,612 dollars.
Where the money actually goes
WordPress comes out at nearly 3x Framer. The subscription is 0 dollars. But plugin licenses and the time for updates, security, backups and the occasional broken plugin add up to 7,200 dollars over three years, with another 1,800 for the managed hosting the other two bundle in for free. That maintenance line alone is larger than the entire Framer total.
The monthly fee everyone argues about is the smallest number on the page. Build hours and maintenance are where the real cost hides.
The cost the 3-year total leaves out: getting back out
The model prices what it costs to run each platform, not what it costs to leave one. That gap runs the opposite way from the headline, and it is the thing WordPress buys with its higher running cost.
- Framer: no official way to export a working site or self-host it. The published site runs on Framer infrastructure, and the third-party exporters that exist produce only a static snapshot, so CMS-driven pages stop updating once you leave.
- Webflow: you can export HTML, CSS and JavaScript, but the export drops the CMS, forms, ecommerce and member areas. Collection lists render empty and forms stop submitting, so a content-driven Webflow site comes out as a static brochure, not the working site.
- WordPress: open source, and you hold the database and the files, so moving to another host is a migration rather than a rebuild. That portability is part of what the higher running cost pays for.
If there is a real chance you outgrow a hosted builder, or you want to own the stack outright, factor a possible rebuild into the Framer or Webflow column. On a brochure or marketing site you never plan to move, that exit cost stays hypothetical and the lower three-year total stands.
Frequently asked questions
Is WordPress really cheaper than Webflow or Framer?
No. Modelled over three years for the same site (14 pages, a 60-post blog, 25,000 monthly visits, built in-house at 70 dollars an hour) it comes to about 12,612 dollars on WordPress versus 7,016 on Webflow and 4,418 on Framer. The free subscription is the smallest line.
Why is WordPress the most expensive website platform?
Because the real cost is plugin licenses plus the hours for updates, security, backups and the occasional breakage, not the 0-dollar subscription. Those push WordPress to nearly 3x the three-year cost of Framer.
Can you move a Framer or Webflow site somewhere else later?
Not as a working site. Framer has no official export or self-hosting, and its third-party exporters produce only a static snapshot, so CMS pages stop updating once you leave. Webflow can export HTML, CSS and JavaScript, but the export drops the CMS, forms, ecommerce and member areas, so a content-driven site comes out as a static brochure. WordPress is open source and portable, so moving it is a migration rather than a rebuild. That lock-in is a cost the 3-year subscription total does not show.
Run the numbers for your own case
Every figure above comes from a free tool you can use in your browser, with no signup.
Model your own 3-year costWhat to actually use
WordPress is free to license and the most expensive to run, because the maintenance line alone beats the entire Framer total. If you do not need WordPress specifically, a hosted builder removes that line:
- Build on Framer (coming soon)The cheapest of the three over three years, about 4,418 dollars, because hosting and maintenance are bundled. The pick for a fast marketing site you do not want to babysit.
- Build on Webflow (coming soon)About 7,016 dollars over three years, still well under WordPress. Worth the gap over Framer when you need its deeper CMS and design control.
If you buy through a link above we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. It never changes which option we call the cheaper or better fit; the math on this page is the same either way.
Get the next cost breakdown by email
We publish a new honest, tool-backed breakdown like this every few days. Leave your email and we will let you know when the next one goes up. One confirmation link, nothing else until you click it.
More data-stories
Shopify Plus vs BigCommerce Enterprise: which is cheaper at your GMV
The two enterprise platforms price very differently. Shopify Plus charges a revenue-banded platform fee plus a small fee on outside gateways; BigCommerce Enterprise charges a flat fee and zero per-sale fee. Which wins depends on your GMV and gateway.
HubSpot vs Pipedrive: the real 3-year cost
On list seat prices, HubSpot Sales Hub Professional is 90 euro per seat against Pipedrive Professional at 49 euro. Over three years for a 5-seat team that is about 16,200 euro versus 8,820 euro, before HubSpot onboarding and contact overage.
HubSpot vs Salesforce: where each one hides its real cost
Neither HubSpot nor Salesforce costs what its seat price suggests. Both roughly double their license line, but in different places: HubSpot in marketing contacts and onboarding, Salesforce in support, add-ons and implementation. Here is how to read each bill.